Showing posts with label Keith Scott-Mumby. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keith Scott-Mumby. Show all posts

Sunday, October 18, 2020

A Simple Explanation of Panspermia--Reprinted article by Keith Scott-Mumby

The following article was written by Keith Scott-Mumby for his alternative healthcare blog. It's an excellent discussion of the power of life forms to survive and spread. He calls it:

Life is Just Awesome!

The thing about life is that it’s… well, living. You might think it’s easy to kill things but not so. Life is prodigious in its powers of replication. Life gets everywhere and THRIVES, no matter what you do.

It takes some seriously sick filth, like man-made chemicals, to harm life.

Even if you wipe out a generation or a strain, SOMETHING will survive. DNA is a mysterious but powerful messenger. It can survive in outer space and still be viable.

That’s why some of us think the earth was colonized from space. It’s a model called “Panspermia” (life everywhere). All that evolutionary hooey, from Charles Darwin and his groveling apologists, like Richard Dawkins, almost certainly never happened. There is no EVIDENCE of evolution, which is curious if it did happen. Where are the intermediate giraffes, with longer and longer necks? There aren’t any. None!

Lack of such evolving life forms is virtual proof that evolution did NOT take place, don’t you think? Consider this quote from Sir Fred Hoyle…

Fred Hoyle

I don’t think he necessarily meant God. But intelligence is something we all participate in (well, except politicians). We are, all of us, the creative force in the universe.

But how did life get through space: no air, no water, no food and very little or no gravity? Plus space is very fierce in the radiation present, such as deadly UV light from the Sun. It could fry a human in minutes and astronauts have to be protected from it.

I repeat: life is prodigious in its powers. Praise be to the Creator of All!

Believe it or not, the first space travelers were seeds. As long ago as 1946, NASA launched an ex-German V-2 rocket carrying maize seeds to observe how they’d be affected by radiation. Since then, the scientific community has learned a great deal about the effects of the space environment on seed germination, metabolism, genetics, biochemistry and even seed production.

Take the 2008 EXPOSE experiment, in which plants were stranded in space for over 550 days, OUTSIDE the International Space Station (ISS), in dead space. 

Astrobiologists David Tepfer and Sydney Leach masterminded research into how seeds would do back on Earth after spending extended periods on the International Space Station. The goal was to understand not only the effects of long-term radiation exposure, but a bit about the molecular mechanisms of those effects.

How Does Nature Do It?

Seeds possess a couple of remarkable traits that Tepfer and Leach hypothesized would give these pioneering seeds more than a fighting chance.

First, they contain multiple copies of important genes – what scientists call redundancy. Genetic redundancy is common in flowering plants, especially food products, such as seedless watermelon and strawberries. If one genetic copy is damaged, there’s still another available to do the job.

Secondly, seed coats contain chemicals called flavonoids that act as sunscreens, protecting the seed’s DNA from damage by ultraviolet (UV) light. On Earth, our planet’s atmosphere filters out some harmful UV light before it can reach us. But in space, there is no protective atmosphere.

The researchers stored the seeds in a single layer on the outside of the ISS behind a special kind of glass that let in ultraviolet radiation only at wavelengths between 110 and 400 nanometers. This made DNA very vulnerable, because it readily absorbs UV radiation in this wavelength range. 

Spaceship

Testing the ability of life to survive OUTSIDE the space station

A second, identical set of seeds was also on the ISS, but shielded completely from UV radiation. The purpose of this experimental design was to observe the effects of UV radiation.

Tepfer and Leach chose tobacco seeds and Arabidopsias, a small plant often used in biology models. Both have a redundant genome and therefore good odds for survival. They also included a genetically engineered variety of tobacco with an antibiotic resistance gene added; the plan was to later test this gene in bacteria and determine if there was any damage. 

In addition to normal Arabidopsis, they sent up two genetically modified strains of the plant that contained low or no UV-protective chemicals in their seed coat. 

Finally, they also included purified DNA and purified flavonoids. This gave the researchers a wide range of scenarios by which to understand the effects of space on the seeds.

Lastly, back on Earth, the researchers performed an experiment back in the lab that exposed Arabidopsis, tobacco and morning glory seeds to very high doses of UV light for only a month.

After all these various exposure conditions, how well did the seeds grow?

The seeds that had been shielded in the lab did the best, with more than 90 percent of them germinated. That’s the benchmark. Next came the seeds that had been exposed to UV radiation for one month in the laboratory, with better than 80 percent germinating.

For the space-traveling seeds, more than 60 percent of the shielded seeds germinated. A mere 3 percent of space UV-exposed seeds did.

Now 3% may not sounds very much. But it’s actually brilliant. It’s doubtful if 3% of turtle young or acorns actually survive. But that’s not a problem because nature is so profligate: a single plant or organism may produce millions of spores or seeds. 

A single human ejaculation releases 100 – 250 million sperm (Live Science website), yet it only takes one sperm to make a baby.

In terms of test species, the Arabidopsis seeds did not survive once planted in soil. Tobacco plants, however, showed reduced growth but that growth rate recovered in subsequent generations. Tobacco has a much heartier seed coat and a more redundant genome, which may explain its apparent survival advantage.

When the researchers plugged the antibiotic resistance gene into bacteria, they found it was still functional after its trip to space. That finding suggests it’s not genetic damage that’s making these seeds less viable. Tepfer and Leach attributed the reduced germination rate to damage to other molecules in the seed besides DNA, maybe the proteins. 

A redundant genome or built-in DNA repair mechanisms couldn’t solve that particular problem, so no wonder the Arabidopsis plants didn’t survive transplanting.

As for the ground experiments, the researchers found that radiation damage is dose-dependent – the more radiation the seeds received, the worse their germination rate.

[These particular researchers probably knew nothing about the phenomenon of hormesis, in which tiny doses of radiation make an organism bigger and more vigorous]

So, YES: space is a very hostile environment and bordering on lethal to life. But not quite. Even if only a few viable organisms get through, colonization is possible.

And maybe somewhere, in the great depths of the heavens, there could be a wandering sperm cell, encased and safe, that bumps into an equally viable human egg, and a baby is born… on Planet Zod!

I’m not trying to spin a wildly improbable religious story, just a fun dream.

But it is possible. Are you ready for the facts, Spielberg?

Monday, August 19, 2019

Reprint: The healing power of love

Here's an excellent article about the nature and power of love, reprinted from alternative physician, Keith Scott-Mumby.


Love As Healer Love As Killer

Some years ago, Kenneth R. Pelletier wrote a book graphically titled: Mind As Healer Mind As Slayer. Yes, the power of mind can heal. We all know that. And, yes, the mind can kill.
Stress is probably the number one killer of all. If you are not happy, balanced, centered and grounded, you are likely subject to stress. Remember my own definition of stress, which “the difference between what you’ve got and what you wanted.” The wider the gap, the more stress you are subject to. We can say the same about love… and there's a science to go with it. Those who are loved, or FEEL that they are loved, live longer and enjoy better health.
That’s why we sometimes talk about “vitamin L”!
So why not Love as Healer, Love as Slayer? Except that love can never slay. Only lack of love (which is one of the worst imaginable stresses) can hurt you. So we are left with just Love as Healer! That’s what I want to talk about.
First of all, what is love? We all think we know... Then on closer questioning, or deeper introspection, the honest ones among us realize we know nothing. Let’s take a shot at defining it.
First, what love is not: Love is not need, longing or desire. To need or desire is to WANT. It basically means lack. Love is not lack.
Love is a fullness and outgoing, a giving and enfolding. There is no lack. It is a state of abundance.
That’s the difference between love in the spiritual or philosophical sense and love in the biological or sexual sense. That kind of “love” can be very needy and demanding. It’s more of a craving than a fulfillment. Lust more than satisfaction.
Nothing wrong with lust and desire... Everything in its place; but to consider that to be pure love, just because it’s intense, is probably misleading. If you keep these two poles well apart in your own mind, then a lot of talk and emotions surrounding love begin to clarify somewhat.

Religious Ecstasy

The highest kind of spiritual love may have no sexual element but can be extremely intense; ecstasy even. That’s the kind of love those deeply engaged in the pursuit of Being and deeper knowledge are likely to encounter or manifest. It shows as love of God, love of The Buddha, love of The One True God, Yahweh, Aphrodite, the love of Christ, or love of the truth.
These are the religious adepts and mystics; Their kind of love is at the ultimate upper end of Being: serene contemplation, thrill, ecstasy and self death.
St. Teresa de Avila, Hildegard of Bingen and St. Francis lived many years in close contact with this level of enlightenment.
13th Century poet and mystic, Rumi, wrote of it in his ecstatic love poems (written for a man, Shams of Tabriz.) John Donne (pronounced Dunn), the Elizabethan poet, hovers over it without actually pressing the GO button!
Artists can manifest it. Michelangelo’s terribilità (driven force, almost madness) was clearly of that order of ecstasy and engagement.
Dance: If you’ve ever seen the “whirling dervishes” (Mevlevi Dervishes), a Muslim sufi sect, you’ll not doubt that a person can pass into ecstasy, simply by prolonged, rhythmical whirling. The Mevlevi, by the way, owe a lot to Rumi.
Let’s come back to earth and consider love for the ‘Everyman.’
As I said, need and desire point to a different phenomenon, most typically the “love” that arises from sexual attachment. It has a place, but it can hurt like hell, as we all know. The pain of love is built into a language and proverbs: “You always hurt the one you love,” or “Love is the most beautiful of dreams and the worst of nightmares,” or “Where there is love, there is pain.” [Spanish Proverb]

The Everly Brothers hit it beautifully with their song, which speaks to every tortured teenage heart, sick with love:
Love hurts, love scars, love wounds and mars
Any heart not tough, nor strong enough
To take a lot of pain, take a lot of pain
Love is like a cloud, holds a lot of rain
Love hurts…
Let me sum it up by saying that kind of love is driven by hormones and pheromones. It’s chemical. We are looking for something better.
Not just romantic, sexual love.

Broken Heart Syndrome

Have you heard of broken heart syndrome? It’s real. Its other name is ‘stress-induced cardiomyopathy’ and a new study shows that an actual heart attack can result from life tragedy, such as losing a loved one.
Imran Arif, MD, UC Health interventional cardiologist, says the symptoms of broken-heart syndrome may be brought on by the heart’s reaction to a surge of stress hormones, and as a result, part of the heart muscle suffers damage.
The newest study by researchers at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston shows that the day following the loss of a loved one, a person is 21 times more likely to suffer a heart attack, and the spike occurs even in people at a low risk for heart attack.[1]

The Healing Power Of Love

We’ll pass on from sexual love to the “real” thing! Perhaps it is, as Ethel Specter Person tells us, “An act of imagination.” For some of us, it will be the great creative triumph of our lives. In its very nature as an act of the imagination lies the source of its power for both good and ill, for it can indeed exploit the lover’s illusions or delusions, but alternately can lead the lover to transcending truths.” [Love and Fateful Encounters, 1989]
This is the kind of love that can heal, can save lives, can create wonder and delight. It’s true! I’ve quoted several times previously the interesting bit of research:
In a Harvard study, researchers discovered that married men who felt loved by their wives experienced 50 percent fewer heart issues, despite having high risk factors like high cholesterol, high blood pressure and diabetes.[2]
Not just men, either. A study from the University of Pittsburgh found that women in happy marriages have a much lower risk of cardiovascular disease than those in high-stress ones. Love really is good for your heart.

Prevention online magazine tells us that the benefits of love are explicit and measurable:
The National Longitudinal Mortality Study, which has been tracking more than a million subjects since 1979, shows that married people live longer. Plus, they have fewer heart attacks and lower cancer rates, and even get pneumonia less frequently than singles.[3]

Put another way, a study done by UCLA researchers found that unmarried people had a "significantly higher" death rate than married couples who live together. Harvard University researchers also found that married women are 20 percent less likely than single women die of stress-related causes like heart disease, suicide and cirrhosis of the liver.
As for married men, they're 100 to 200 percent times less likely to die of these causes than single men are. Love is healing!
Some experts think it won't be long before doctors prescribe steamy sex, romantic getaways, and caring communication!
That’s a whole lot better idea than pills and exercise! Yay!
Have fun! (wink!)

Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor

Sources:
1. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-02-emotional-grief-heart.html
2. https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/marriage-and-mens-health
3. https://www.prevention.com/sex/relationships/a20435514/how-love-keeps-you-healthy/#ixzz2Zt8bXeaV