The Latest Scientific Data Regarding Human-Caused Climate Change--It Ain't True!

 Here is a definitive study just published that completely refutes human-caused global climate change. I have been saying this all along, of course, and here it is in black and white. The study was designed and edited by humans, and researched and written by GROK-3 AI.   The long and short of it is that large ecosystem effects are primarily caused by solar radiation variability (flares and whatnot) and by oceanic gas emissions. Human effect in the face of these gigantic forces is provably negligible.  

I'll attach the study Abstract here, and you can see the entire article by following the link. Warning, though—it's heavy science and math. If you do access the article, you can skip the methods and results and go straight to the end Conclusion.  

  https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/SCC-Grok-3-Review-V5-1.pdf

The "conspiracy" angle to the global warming "hoax" is that powerful economic and political forces always want more control and money, and "global warming" has been used to control our choices in everything from the stoves we cook on to the cars we drive, not to mention the Chinese-produced solar panels we are encouraged to park on our rooftops.

Here's the article Abstract:

A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions   

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) attributes observed climate variability primarily to anthropogenic CO₂ emissions, asserting that these emissions have driven approximately 1 Wm⁻² of net radiative forcing since 1750, resulting in a global temperature rise of 0.8- 1.1°C. This conclusion relies heavily on adjusted datasets and outputs from global climate models (GCMs) within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) framework. However, this study conducts a rigorous evaluation of these assertions by juxtaposing them against unadjusted observational data and synthesizing findings from recent peer-reviewed literature. Our analysis reveals that human CO₂ emissions, constituting a mere 4% of the annual carbon cycle, are dwarfed by natural fluxes, with isotopic signatures and residence time data indicating negligible long-term atmospheric retention. Moreover, individual CMIP3 (2005-2006), CMIP5 (2010-2014), and CMIP6 (2013-2016) model runs consistently fail to replicate observed temperature trajectories and sea ice extent trends, exhibiting correlations (R²) near zero when compared to unadjusted records. A critical flaw emerges in the IPCC’s reliance on a single, low-variability Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) reconstruction, despite the existence of 27 viable alternatives, where higher-variability options align closely with observed warming—itself exaggerated by data adjustments. We conclude that the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis lacks empirical substantiation, overshadowed by natural drivers such as temperature feedbacks and solar variability, necessitating a fundamental reevaluation of current climate paradigms.

p.s. from cyd--Hopefully this article of mine and the original scientific findings published in the journal will not be shadow-banned or censored out of existence by the powerful forces manipulating our free thinking and sharing as they have since the covid era. All of my covid articles were censored and shadow-banned. Hopefully a new era of free speech has arrived.